Law Offices of Tracy Ettinghoff

CALL FOR A CONSULTATION
949-363-5573

  • Home
  • About
  • Practice Areas
    • Interpretation & Enforcement of CC&Rs
    • Construction Defect Litigation
    • Easements
    • Escrow Disputes
    • Foreclosures
    • Real Estate Fraud
    • HOA Assessment Collections
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Real Estate Transactions
    • Short Sales
    • Unlawful Detainers
  • Legal Updates
  • Clients
    • Resources
  • Consultation
  • Contact Law Office of Tracy Ettinghoff

January 2, 2014 By Tracy Ettinghoff

Terminating Joint Tenancy Can Trigger Reassessment

In a recent published decision, the appellate court in Marin County held that terminating a family joint tenancy by transferring title into tenancy in common can constitute a “change in ownership” for the purpose of tax reassesment, even though the same family members stay on title. In Benson vs. Marin County Assessment Appeals Board, 219 Cal.App.4th 1445 (Sept. 2013), two brothers inherited a residential property from their mother. One of the brothers was already on title when the mother died, so he put his other brother on title with him < as a joint tenant. For 10 years, the two brothers held title as joint tenants. Then the second brother deeded his own joint tenancy interest to himself as a tenant in common with his brother. He and his brother continued to own the property and retained the same percentage ownership as before. The Marin County tax assessor determined a “change in ownership” occurred as a result of the recording of the deed changing the method of holding title from Joint Tenancy to Tenants in Common. The original assessed value was $100,631 and upon Reassessment, the assessed value increased to $525,323.00, thus resulting in a significant increase in taxes. The Assessment Appeals Board disagreed and found that this was merely a change in the way title was held and therefore did not constitute a “change in ownership”. The Tax Assessor appealed.

 

The appellate court analyzed the complicated statutes dealing with changes in ownership and concluded that the Tax Assessor was correct and that a “change in ownership” occurred when the title was changed between the two brothers from joint tenancy to tenants in common. Generally, the creation of a joint tenancy, where the transferor remains on title as one of the joint tenants, does not constitute a “change in ownership”. However, if the joint tenants later transfer title from the joint tenancy into tenants in common, this does trigger a reassessment for tax purposes.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

May 31, 2011 By Tracy Ettinghoff Leave a Comment

Thanks for Visiting

This is your source for information about Real Estate Law in Orange County, California.  The author is a real estate attorney who has more than 25 years of experience.  Issues will include Homeowner Association Law, Foreclosures, Short Sales, Real Estate Contracts, Escrows, and other real estate related issues.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Foreclosures, Homeowner Associations, Short Sale

Practice Areas

  • Construction Defect Litigation
  • Easements
  • Escrow Disputes
  • Foreclosures
  • Interpretation & Enforcement of CCRs
  • HOA Assessment Collections
  • Real Estate Fraud
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Real Estate Transactions
  • Short Sales
  • Unlawful Detainers

Categories

  • Brokers (18)
  • Contract Disputes (13)
  • Foreclosures (8)
  • Homeowner Association Law (9)
  • Real Property Taxation (1)
  • Short Sales (8)
  • Uncategorized (2)

Contact Us

Let us help you with your legal matter. Fill out the information below to begin your consultation.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Law Offices of Tracy Ettinghoff
Orange County Real Estate Attorney

30011 Ivy Glenn, Suite 121
Laguna Niguel, California 92677
Phone: (949) 363-5573
Fax: (949) 363-1306
Email: te@ettinghoff.com

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer · Contact Us · Photo Credits
The information on this website is for general information purposes only.
Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation.
This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.